Yes, but what kind of mask?
57 min
Hello and welcome to the Barrcast. I’m your host, Nick Barr, coming to you on a brisk fall Wednesday morning here in New York. So a lot of you have been messaging me saying, “Nick, when is your review of You Can See Everything going to come out?” And I resisted for some time, but I’m relenting. And so this will be not exactly a review of You Can See Everything, but an analysis of the film through the lens of this larger project that I’m working on. So if you’ve been following along with the Barrcast, you know we’re doing a lot of work on the Enneagram number 5. We are reading R.D. Laing’s The Divided Self. We are exploring what Naranjo calls the clinical antecedents of the Enneagram 5, which is the schizoid personality, the autistic personality, the highly sensitive personality, because I think there’s something really important about understanding this personality. Particularly right now. And Nathan Fielder has gifted us with a film that does exactly that. This is a film directed by someone who, you know, in Nathan Fielder, we recognize the personality type, and its subject is, in Elizabeth Holmes, someone who at least potentially has this personality type. And more importantly, this is ultimately a character study. This film is really about understanding. It is based on Nathan Fielder’s wish to understand Elizabeth Holmes’s way of being. And this film is coming at the perfect time in his career, because he’s matured so much that he’s at a stage where he recognizes that understanding is also never neutral. And so his need to understand itself comes under examination. So this is really all about understanding, and the Enneagram 5 is all about understanding, the need to understand, the need to know. But knowing is never complete. There’s always more understanding that can be achieved. There is a totemic (and I use that word because one of the keywords for the social 5 is totem), there’s sort of this longed-for vantage point. You know what Wallace Stevens says: the po...